Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Sao Paulo Med J ; 140(3): 372-377, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1833818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Favipiravir is generally used in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in Turkey. OBJECTIVE: To determine the side effects of favipiravir and whether it is a good treatment option. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study conducted in Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: 357 patients who completed favipiravir treatment at the recommended dose were included. 37 patients with drug side effects and 320 patients without drug side effects were examined in two groups. RESULTS: Side effects were observed in 37 (10.36%) out of 357 patients using favipiravir. The most common side effect was liver dysfunction, in 26 (7.28%) of the patients. The following other side effects were also observed: diarrhea (1.4%), nausea (0.84%), abdominal pain (0.28%) and thrombocytopenia (0.28%). One patient (0.28%) presented both increased transaminases and nausea. CONCLUSION: In this study, it was determined that favipiravir may constitute an alternative for treating COVID-19 pneumonia given that its side effects are generally well tolerated and not serious.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Amides , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy , Humans , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/drug therapy , Pyrazines , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(12): e14993, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1488204

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There are many clinical conditions, such as lung cancer, that need to be followed up and treated during a pandemic. Providing health care for patients who are immune-suppressive requires extra care. METHOD: Among 108 lung cancer patients who had been hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic, 18 with respiratory symptoms were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 64 ± 9.4 with a male predominance (male n = 16, female n = 2). Thirteen had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 5 had small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nine (50%) patients were receiving chemotherapy. The most common symptom was shortness of breath (n = 14, 77.8%), followed by fever (n = 10, 55.6%). The findings confirmed on computed thorax tomography (CTT) were as follows: consolidation (n = 8, 44.4%), ground glass opacities (n = 8, 44.4%) and thoracic tumour/mediastinal-hilar lymphadenopathy (n = 3, 16.7%). Hypoxia was seen in 11 patients (61.1%), twelve patients had an elevated LDH (median = 302 ± 197) and lymphopenia (median = 1055 ± 648) and 5 (27.7%) were highly suspected of having contracted COVID-19. None of their nasopharyngeal swaps was positive. Two of these 5 patients received COVID-19 specific treatment even though they thrice had negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results. The two patients responded well to both clinical and radiological treatments. For one case with SCLC receiving immunotherapy, methylprednisolone was initiated for radiation pneumonitis after excluding COVID-19. CONCLUSION: In line with a country's health policies and the adequacy of its health system, the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in the management and treatment of complications in patients with lung cancer has become even more important during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Aged , Female , Humans , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Tuberk Toraks ; 69(2): 196-206, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1310190

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of parameters that will predict prognosis in COVID19 disease ensures correct determination of treatment strategy. In this study, it was aimed to determine the clinical, radiological and laboratory parameters affecting mortality and to evaluate the risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 in September 2020 were included in the study. Clinical features, laboratory parameters, and radiological findings at admission were recorded. The relationship of these parameters with 30-day mortality was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows 16.0 Package Program. RESULT: Three hundred and sixty patients (female/male, n= 228/132) hospitalized in the specified period were included in the study. 30-day mortality rate was 14.4% in all patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, age, presence of heart failure, admission oxygen saturation, body temperature higher than 38.2 and high ferritin levels were evaluated as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between clinical and laboratory markers and mortality is very important for the correct orientation of healthcare services and the correct determination of treatment strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Inpatients , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Turkey/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL